11/13/2023 0 Comments Vietnam war us navy uniform![]() ![]() ![]() The Supreme Court remanded the case and directed counsel to examine issues relative to jurisdiction and exhaustion of remedies. The District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals had found the law under which Avrech was convicted to be “ unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.” Supreme Court said law was not unconstitutional involvement in Vietnam, was convicted in a court martial for violating Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which called for punishing “all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces” and “all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.” Mark Avrech, who had sought to mimeograph a statement questioning U.S. Circuit court said military law was vague, overbroad in restricting speech 676 (1974), reinstated the conviction of a former serviceman for distribution of statements designed to promote disloyalty among fellow soldiers. The Supreme Court in Secretary of the Navy v. (AP Photo/Olson, used with permission from the Associated Press) Navy hospital corpsman from Pennsylvania, uses his stethoscope to listen for digging by North Vietnamese troops underneath a U.S. In this photo of the Vietnam War, Theodore Rutkowski, a U.S. involvement in Vietnam, after saying the military law under which he was convicted had already withstood a First Amendment challenge. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a former serviceman who had mimeographed statements questioning the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |